ORAL PIERCING
Piercing is becoming a more prevalent form of
body art and self-expression in today's society. However, oral piercings, which involve
the tongue (the most common site), lips, cheeks, uvula or a combination of sites, have
been implicated in a number of adverse oral and systemic conditions.
Patients typically undergo piercing procedures without anesthetic. In tongue piercing,
for example, a barbell-shaped piece of jewelry typically is placed to transverse the
thickness of the tongue at the midline in its anterior one-third using a needle.
Initially, a temporary device longer than the jewelry of choice is placed to accommodate
postpiercing swelling. The free end of the barbell stem then is inserted into the hole in
a ventral-dorsal direction. The recipient grasps the free end of the shank between the
maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth and screws the ball onto the stem. The barbell
also can be placed laterally, with the studs on the dorsolateral lingual surface. In the
absence of complications, healing takes four to six weeks.
In lip or cheek piercing, jewelry position (usually a labrette) is determined primarily
by aesthetics with consideration to where the jewelry will rest intraorally. Once position
is determined, a cork is usually placed inside the mouth to support the tissue as it is
pierced with a needle. The needle is inserted through the tissue and into the cork
backing. The needle then is replaced with the labrette stud, and the disc backing is
screwed into place. Healing time can range from weeks to months.
Common symptoms following piercing include pain, swelling, infection and increased
salivary flow. Potential complications of intraoral and perioral piercings are numerous,
although available scientific literature is rather limited and consists mainly of case
reports. Possible adverse outcomes secondary to oral piercing include increased salivary
flow; gingival injury or recession; damage to teeth, restorations and fixed porcelain
prostheses; interference with speech, mastication or deglutition; scar-tissue formation;
and development of metal hypersensitivities. Because of the tongue's vascular nature,
prolonged bleeding can result if vessels are punctured during the piercing procedure. In
addition, the technique for inserting tongue jewelry may abrade or fracture anterior
dentition, and digital manipulation of the jewelry can significantly increase the
potential for infection. Airway obstruction due to pronounced edema or aspiration of
jewelry poses another risk, and aspirated or ingested jewelry could present a hazard to
respiratory or digestive organs. In addition, oral ornaments can compromise dental
diagnosis by obscuring anatomy and defects in x-rays. It also has been speculated that
galvanic currents from stainless-steel oral jewelry in contact with other intraoral metals
could result in pulpal sensitivity.
The National Institutes of Health has identified piercing as a possible vector for
bloodborne hepatitis (hepatitis B, C, D and G) transmission. Disease transmission (e.g.,
hepatitis B, tetanus, localized tuberculosis) has been associated with ear piercing, and
cases of endocarditis have been linked to both nose and ear piercing.
Secondary infection from oral piercing can be serious. A recent article in the British
Dental Journal reported a case of Ludwig's angina, a rapidly spreading cellulitis
involving the submandibular, sublingual and submental fascial spaces bilaterally, that
manifested four days after the 25-year-old patient had her tongue pierced. Intubation was
necessary to secure the airway. When antibiotic therapy failed to resolve the condition,
surgical intervention was required to remove the barbell-shaped jewelry and decompress the
swelling in the floor of the mouth.
Because of its potential for numerous negative sequelae, the ADA opposes the practice
of intraoral/perioral piercing. |